Not sure this is the last nail in the coffin of HRA damages claims piggy-backing on care proceedings, but the bag of nails certainly isn’t full any more. The High Court have given judg…
Not sure this is the last nail in the coffin of HRA damages claims piggy-backing on care proceedings, but the bag of nails certainly isn’t full any more.
The High Court have given judgment in Re CZ (Human Rights Claim:Costs) 2017
The fact that there was a breach is impossible to deny and the LA accepted it. (Even looking at the recent steer from the Hackney authority that failure to follow guidance does not amount without more to an actionable claim, this one goes far beyond that)
12.CZ was born by emergency caesarean section at X Hospital on 6 November. It was a traumatic birth and CZ was for a short time placed on the Special Care Baby Unit (‘SCBU’). The baby was slow to feed, and showed temporary normal…
View original post 4,108 more words
Warning. Your child/natural child could have been going under a false name from the time they were adopted, maybe even before that and not know. This is what’s happened to my son/natural son and first he knew was from me. This can cause identity issues both currently and in the future. It’s everyone’s rights to know their TRUE identity! In turn, this has confused the status as to whether I’m mum or said child is son by law and all my family’s human rights it appears have been breached from 10 years ago! It will not be a child’s fault when they did not know! This is the serious damage being caused to our children, to our families. How many children are not aware their identity’s have been toyed with! xx