Tarama-TOLATA

suesspiciousminds

I don’t normally write on financial cases, but this one is rather significant (and one can see that it might end up bleeding into other areas)

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4110.html

Seagrove v Sullivan (Practice Directions re bundles and citations of authorities) 2014

This was a case in which Mr Sullivan had lived with Ms Seagrove for over twenty years and they had had children together, but never married. The youngest child was ten. Mr Sullivan owned a house, valued at around £2,300,000.

The equity in that property amounted to about £1 million.

Ms Seagrove had made a claim under TOLATA Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, and under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 to seek a financial interest in that property and its 14 acres of land, as there was no marriage ancillary relief was not an option.

The case came before Holman J.

He was, well aghast…

View original post 2,999 more words

Advertisements
Standard

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s